Human Basic need of Security

Topics
Meaning of Security	Government & Security	Security a Basic Need
Weakness & Security	Questions about Security	Nation’s Security

The meaning of Security:

Security begins with protecting oneself and family, and extends to guarding our community, its assets, and its equity. It shields us from predators, plunderers, thieves, bullies, and those who deprive. It prepares us against natural disasters. Security guarantees survival. Security sustains prosperity. Security sustains peace. Without security, basic human rights cannot be protected or promoted.

Yet security also acknowledges that we are vulnerable. Vulnerability is not weakness—it is humility, the recognition that we depend on one another and must remain vigilant. Weakness, by contrast, is depletion: the collapse of strength, the surrender of what you hold true. Vulnerability invites stewardship; weakness erodes it.

But weakness is not to be ignored. It is a gauge—a warning light that signals the need for reinforcement, nourishment, or replenishment. To recognize weakness is to recognize the call for renewal. Ignoring it leads to collapse; attending to it leads to restoration.

To be secure is to know your vulnerability, to heed your weakness as a measure of your needs, and to never surrender to depletion. Security is the balance of humility and strength, the foundation upon which dignity, prosperity, and peace endure.

Our basic right to Security ranks up there with sustenance, shelter and propagation. During simple times when weapons of mass destruction and guns were not yet invented, it was with pride that every household possessed weapons; weapons that can defend, keep the peace, commit crime or whatever the user may want his weapon to be used for. As civilization prospered and got more sophisticated, governance decided to control the number and types of weapons possessed by their citizens.

Government Stepped in to control:

Government (or group that controls) became in charge of security and the responsibility for securing the peace in the community became that of the government. This is a good thing because security guarantees survival. However, government does not want the citizens to possess lethal weapons. So rules and laws were created to justify this demand from the government. When crimes were committed with the use of lethal weapons, the argument for the disarmament of the citizens became stronger. Laws and rules and the enforcement thereof where always based on the criminal actions of the few demented people who are bullies and do not value respect and kindness.

Indeed violence always begets violence because to defend oneself against a violent attack has the ingredient of violence. There is always retaliation. The reaction of the government is always the same: “disarmament”. But this is not the answer. The answer is in the behavior of humans.

Security is a basic need of an individual:

The basic human need for security is a cornerstone of Universal Stewardship, but it must be understood not just as a physical safeguard but as an inherent individual right. Security lies fundamentally with the individual, and this right must be protected and preserved by the structures that govern society, especially the government. However, the protection of security does not equate to unchecked government control, nor does it imply anarchy. In a properly functioning society, the government exists to ensure the safety and well-being of its people. When left unchecked or allowed to act without the consent of the governed, however, government can become a threat to individual freedoms, including the right to security.

This brings us to the idea that, to prevent such abuses, guardians of the principles of Universal Stewardship must be in place—individuals, organizations, or institutions whose role it is to monitor and hold the government accountable to the standards of justice, equity, and human dignity. These guardians, rooted in a system of ethical stewardship, would ensure that government actions align with the principles of fairness and collective well-being, particularly in regard to fundamental human rights like security.

The right to security is, therefore, not an absolute government prerogative, but an individual right that must be safeguarded. The individual is not merely passive in this equation; to protect oneself, one must possess the skills, knowledge, and tools to defend their life, property, and well-being. This includes the right to possess tools of self-defense, whether they be skills, physical tools, or legal means, to protect their security. These tools, which could range from personal safety measures to legal property rights, are not privileges granted by the state but inherent rights to be preserved and respected.

At the same time, security must also be rooted in respect, kindness, and human dignity. These values must be instilled in the next generation by parents, schools, and society at large. In an ethical society, security is not merely about the absence of threats or violence, but about creating an environment where individuals can flourish without fear. Respect for others’ rights and kindness in interactions are vital to maintaining this peace.

The education system, in particular, plays a critical role in teaching the next generation not just how to protect themselves physically, but also how to engage with the world in ways that contribute to collective security. It must teach the values of self-respect, personal responsibility, and the recognition that true security comes from both individual empowerment and social solidarity. Likewise, governmental structures must uphold and support these principles of respect and kindness as they enact laws and policies, recognizing that security is the right of every individual, not the exclusive domain of the state.

Finally, ownership is central to individual security. An individual’s ability to protect their possessions, whether material or intangible, is crucial to their security. The right to own tools of defense and to safeguard what one has earned or invested in should never be maliciously stripped away. When someone’s personal property—whether a home, business, or land—is taken unjustly, it is not only a violation of security but a direct attack on their human dignity. In the stewardship model, this would be an infringement upon the responsibility of society to maintain equitable access to resources and security for all individuals. Possession, in this case, is not just about private ownership but about the responsibility to protect and sustain one’s resources without harming others.

Security, then, is not merely the absence of danger but the presence of empowerment, respect, and responsibility. It requires a balance between individual rights and the ethical obligations of both individuals and governments to ensure that all members of society can live in peace and flourish. The interconnectedness of individual rights, social responsibility, and stewardship creates a framework where security is a shared goal, nurtured by both the state and society, but ultimately upheld by the inherent rights of the individual.

In summary, security in the context of Universal Stewardship is a fundamental human right that must be protected not just through government action but through the empowerment of individuals, the cultivation of respect and kindness, and the responsible ownership of resources. Government must serve as a guardian of this right, but it must never have the power to infringe upon it without consent. Instead, security must be a shared, balanced responsibility, where individuals and governments work together to foster a society in which everyone has the ability to protect their lives, property, and freedom in a context of justice, equity, and mutual respect.

Weakness deteriorates security:

There is no security in weakness. We must protect our prosperity. This does not mean that others are not welcome. On the contrary, all peaceful and law abiding people are welcome to visit or stay. Strength in security does not mean oppression or totalitarianism. It only means PROTECTION. The moment the borders become weak, intruders will immediately trespass and deprive. They will attempt to take over. They will cluster become strong and deprive the community and impose their rules and make it part of government.They will infiltrate and will take over from within.

Those who want to stay in power or take over, always want others to practice tolerance. They always insist on the transparency of security. Transparency destroys security. The strength of security relies on privacy and secrecy.

Fight, not because you hate or you are hated, fight because you are defending and protecting what and who you love and respect.

A few questions for those who think that security is not an important factor in life:

Why did cavemen guard their caves? Security.
Why do you have doors? Security.
Why do you have fences? Security.
Why do you have secret passwords? Security.
Why do you save money? Security.
Why do you learn self-defense? Security.
Why do people, companies and nations have contracts, covenants or treaties? Security.
Why do countries have militaries? Security.
Why do nations form alliances? Security.
Why do communities have police? Security.
Why are there check points? Security.
Why are there health quarantines? Security.
When there is a pandemic why are borders locked down? Security.

Never take your security for granted. Be on guard at all times. There are bullies all around us. Your prosperity can’t be sustained without security. Be careful and cautious of the leaders who use the issue of security to promote fear. Always gauge their actions on the scale of “PRUDENCE“.

Nation’s Security

The government of a nation cannot sustain without robust security. Its primary obligation is to its citizens and legal residents, for whom the nation is fundamentally created, not for foreigners. Their security and well-being must always be upheld as the government’s foremost duty.

Borders must be protected with unwavering resolve. Legal immigrants, who adhere to established laws and processes, are welcome contributors to the prosperity of the country. Immigration is not a right; it is a privilege.

Status of Visitors, tourists, Students on visas

Individuals who enter a nation as visitors, tourists, or students under various visa categories are granted temporary access, not permanent residence. Their stay in the country is not an inherent right; it is a privilege, extended by the courtesy and discretion of the host nation, not by obligation. While in the country and under its jurisdiction, they will be protected.

These non-citizens are expected to adhere strictly to the laws of the land and, crucially, to uphold a profound respect for the host country, its culture, and its people. Any act of disrespect towards the nation, its symbols, its institutions, or its citizens will be dealt with accordingly. The expansive concept of “free speech” as understood by citizens does not fully extend to non-citizens whose presence is conditional. Their right to free speech is inherently limited within the bounds of respectful language toward and about the nation.

Continued violation of this principle of respect, or any other terms of their visa, will result in the immediate and decisive revocation of their visa or temporary stay, leading to prompt deportation. This ensures that the privilege of presence is not abused and that the nation’s sovereignty and domestic harmony are protected.

Regarding those who seek entry outside of legal frameworks:

Asylum seekers must enter the country via a designated port of entry and must formally declare their intention to seek help, thereby subjecting their future to the decisions of the nation’s courts. The nation has no inherent obligation to accept them. All asylum claims must undergo thorough and proper vetting. While their cases are in process, asylum seekers do not possess the same rights as citizens; their request for asylum is not tantamount to immediate freedom within the country. Asylum status signifies they are in a legal process, awaiting a decision.
Illegal immigrants: Anyone who enters a country illegally—without passing through an official port of entry and without proper documentation—should be subject to immediate deportation upon apprehension. These individuals are not citizens and therefore do not require the same due process rights as citizens. Some may obtain false identification and live as residents, with their children receiving the same benefits as legal residents. However, the length of time spent living in the country without authorization does not grant amnesty or change their status. It is their responsibility to seek legal documentation. Regardless of how many years have passed or the connections they have formed, if they are caught, they remain in the country illegally and should be deported.

Beyond its borders, a nation’s security is further strengthened through strategic alliances. A stronger country must assist its weaker ally, but such alliances must always be fostered with a clear understanding of mutual benefit and the principle of give and take.

A different article you may find interesting:
August 03, 2025

Head Start – Living is not a race

Living is not a RACE. There is no such thing as a “head start” to Live, Love, Learn, Teach, Share and be happy. Opportunities in life are not found in a linear path. Opportunities are all around us. You can be way behind and still get the best opportunity in life. Learn from the experiences of others. Learn the lessons of history and not just the events. Do not blame the past for where you are still standing. Move on and improve. We are humans. We have the freedom of Choice. Choose to communicate, choose to improve, choose to be part of someone, choose to accept people’s kindness. Choose to learn from history to be better and not bitter.

Security